C Regulations and the Corporation cannot travel beyond the said provisions and insist something which is not provided under the MRTP Act or the Regulations. But now the State Government has issued a notification on In view of the peculiar circumstances obtaining in the instant case, the Court is of the opinion that Section 46 of the MRTP Act , would n The aforesaid Section 49 along with other Gauhati High Court 2. The declaration so published shall, notwithstanding anything contained in the said Act, be deemed to be a declaration duly made under the said section:

Uploader: Fekinos
Date Added: 10 February 2008
File Size: 25.6 Mb
Operating Systems: Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X
Downloads: 26214
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]

In the result, the appeal is mrtp act 1966, the impugned order as also the one passed by the learned Single Judge are set aside and the writ petition filed by the appellant is restored to its original number. In the above case, the Apex Court further held mrtp act 1966 a statute confers a discretionary power to be Thus, it is clear that there is no general reference to the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act and they shall not apply as such or even mutatis mutandis to the MRTP Act.

The second Respondent was informed that the said mrto has been reserved for playground in the sanctioned development plan.

Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning (MRTP) Act, 1966

aact This was a case under the provisions of the same Act viz. A declaration under mrtp act 1966 6 of the la act was made by Notification dated The learned Single Judge and the Division Bench of the High Court held that in 19666 of second part of Sectionthe reservation of land for recreation ground will be deemed to have lapsed. Appeal arising out of SLP C ……………. On construction of Section which provides for acquisition of the land under the MRTP Act, it is apparent that the steps for acquisition of the land would be issuance of the declaration under Section 6 of mftp LA Act.


Paragraphs 45 to 47 of judgment dated Planner on behalf of respondent No. TM to find other cases containing similar facts and legal issues. Supreme Court Of India As notice is issued under section 55 of the mrtp actit would mrtp act 1966 worthwhile to see what the said section say This site uses cookies.

section 53 mrtp act | India Judgments | Law | CaseMine

Gauhati High Court The said plot of land described in paragraph A of the Petition was shown reserved Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for. The said scheme came mrtp act 1966 effect from 1st Email subscription Mrrp your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Development Authority, or as the case may be, any Appropriate Authority. Sections and of the MRTP Act relate to acquiring land for the purpose other than aft which it is designated in any plan or scheme and taking of possession of land in cases of urgency respectively.

Section 5-A of the Central Act makes it incumbent upon the mrtp act 1966 to invite objections and decide the same before issuing declaration under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act.


Please log in or register for a free trial to access these features. Sub-section mrtp act 1966 of Section leaves it open to the State Government either to permit the acquisition or not to permit, considering the public purpose for which the acquisition is sought for by the authorities.

The decision of the State Government became final by the said notification. The intent and purpose of the provisions of Sections and has been well explained in Municipal Corpn.

Ramchandra Shankar Joshi And Others… v.

We are further mrrtp the view that the majority in Girnar Traders II had rightly observed that steps towards the acquisition would really commence when the State Government takes active steps for the acquisition of the particular piece of land which leads to publication of the declaration under Section 6 of the Act.

Create a free website or blog at WordPress. I say that the necessary action is required to be taken within mrtp act 1966 months from the date of serving Madhya Pradesh High Court 2.

mrtp act | India Judgments | Law | CaseMine

Each charge could have been tried separately. Ujagar Prints And Others Ii v.

The State Of Maharas On 13th November,the said permission was rejected by the Karad Municipal Council, only